Model Train Forum banner
1 - 20 of 21 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,449 Posts
I haven't bought a train magazine since the 80's.

Full of more ads than substance and every review is slanted if the manufacturer is also an advertiser.

Model Railroad Craftsman was the last magazine I think I subscribed to. Thez had nice scenicing articles, and structure articles.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,996 Posts
Model Railroad Hobbyist is a free online magazine. It has loads of how-to articles. I do find many of them to be above my skill and energy levels. Check it out...

https://model-railroad-hobbyist.com
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
918 Posts
I have subscribed to CCT and OGR since they started. I have read every issue of Model Railroader since it started, but had to buy the oldest original issues from another modeler.

Long time subscriber to Trains also. I love the magazine from the Milwaukee Road Historical Assn. and used to get the UP and C&NW as well.

When my current subscriptions end, I am going to only have the following:

CTT, Trains, and Classic Trains and the Milwaukee RD magazine.

Art
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
680 Posts
I subscribe to CTT & OGR. I have for two years now. As a beginner, I couldn't get enough information and they both gave me a good snapshot of the hobby.

Now that I know it all :D, I'm about to let CTT lapse. They're both too expensive for what they are (CTT is $40 for 8 issues). I read them and toss them so $5 per issue isn't a great value for me. But CTT is more focused on postwar which is before my time. I have enjoyed learning about the history of the hobby but I have zero interest in owning any postwar trains.

I do like a good old fashioned, hard copy, paper magazine though. I'm not interested in digital editions.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
55 Posts
I’ve subscribed to print editions of both CTT and OGR for 29 years.

I prefer OGR because the layout articles are actually written by the layout owner. Most layout articles in CTT are written by Roger Carp and are derived from a lengthy questionnaire he sends the layout owner. While I like Roger’s writing in CTT’s special interest publications; I find his style is a bit too “sugary” and formulaic where it comes to layout articles.

As a new hobbyist; your interest will likely be more toward “how to” articles and both magazines are a good resource in this regard.

Frankly; unless you have budget constraints; I’d suggest subscribing to both for at least one year. You’ll pick up twice as many good tips and, after 12 months; you’ll also be able to make an informed decision which one YOU like best.

Curt
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
134 Posts
Curt, I agree with your summary of CTT. While Roger Carp seems like a good man, I find his layout narration "cookie-cutter" and rather monotonous; in fact, I can't even read his narration anymore its that boring to me. A good many CTT articles are geared towards the Postwar enthusiast, and every year I come close to not renewing my subscription because of this, i.e., I am just not interested in Postwar trains or the collections. But, that is their namesake, so they need to do that for people who love that subject.

I have back issues of OGR and CTT since the late 80s and 90s...and they've both evolved over the years to a changing demographic...almost catering to a Ready-to-Run audience it seems.

If I had to choose just one magazine to buy, it'd be OGR. The layout coverages are much more expansive with lots more photos than CTT, and that and various authors describing their layouts makes it a better magazine for me.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
127 Posts
I only subscribe to the digital edition of OGR right now. I can't handle any more hard copy magazines around here...its clutter and a fire hazard.

However, I enjoy reading old (pre-1960) magazines like Toy Trains, Model Trains, and even Model Railroader, which was the first magazine I ever read as a kid. I enjoy the ads as much as the articles and photos.
 
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top