Code 83 looks nicer (smaller more prototypical rails and tie size/spacing) but is more expensive and some of the earlier rolling stock won't run well on it (flanges too tall on the wheels.)

I run Code 100.

 

I use code 100 since I have allot of older equipment. Atlas makes the best flex track. They also were the cheapest but have been raising there prices. If the price goes above Peco I will switch to that. For switches I prefer the Peco ones. Switch motors I use the Tortoises when I can mount them under the table and Atlas machines above.

 

tk you sound like me.....ditto that post! Jim

 

I also run all atlas code 100, less compatibility issues, derailments and of course the cost! I can run anything made new and old and I like that!

 

Sounds Good so far leaning towards the 100. Thanks All

 

Bachmann EZ track for this reason: It's easy to pull apart in case of any issues (and cleaning), and can be rearranged as you see fit. It also looks marvelous.

-J.

 

Not a big fan of the easy track, yea it goes together easy but it dont look all that great and I have heard alot of horror stories about it. As far as not conducting well. Thank you though. Still liking the code 100.

 

for me its any track that works is the best track

but ez track for when I just need to run my trains and all i got is carpet, code 100 for older things and what ever i want on my main layout...83 is just for back up/display set ups and things like that....

 

Kato Unitrack HO

Anyone use the Kato Unitrack HO track? If so how is it?

 

I use kato. Haven't had any issues with it, but the cost is up there.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_srThYTU1GU&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Here is a link to my YouTube videos if you wana see what it looks like with ballest.