which DCC system name brand is mostlyrecommended for beginners? does anyone have reasons to choose one brand over the other?
That’s great information, thank you so much for your help, a lot to think aboutThat's a tough question, and you'll probably get a thousand different answers. But it really depends on what you want or if it and your preferences. Are you running a large layout, lots of sound locos? Or just a small layout with 1 or 2 locos? Do you want more automation? Do you want to control with a phone, computer, wireless handheld? Are you ok with a little DIY, or want a "turn key" solution?
Some people prefer one brands format, other prefer a different one. Personally, I prefer DCC-EX and engine driver on a phone. Others might not. It all depends on your preference.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
If you are tech savvy, you can save a lot of money by building your own DCC++ system.
I went the simpler route, and paid about $180 for an NCE PowerCab starter set. It has everything you need to run trains on a DCC layout, and will handle several locomotives running at the same time. In my opinion, it is the least expensive off-the-shelf full-function DCC system.
The only down side with the NCE PowerCab is that there is only one output for the track... meaning the same output is used for a programming track. Programming tracks are good for 2 important reasons:
First, when programming a locomotive, you don't want to accidentally program other locos on the layout. Having a "Programming Track" makes it impossible to accidentally change CV values on other locos. When programming, you select the loco to program, so it's not a huge issue, but all new locos come from the factory as loco number "003" So it IS possible to have more than one "003" sitting on your layout.
Second, the DCC system doesn't allow too much amperage through to the test track, so you have less chance of frying a decoder when putting it on the tracks for the first time (in case of a short).
So I just remove all the locos from my layout before doing any CV programming just in case. Other systems have separate outputs for the programming track, and most people just use a short section of track to do the programming that is completely detached from the actual layout.
JMRI is a huge time saver for programming! I also like that I can export my roster from JMRI into the DCCEX so that my roster appears in engine driver. I can just select the locos by name. You can do that without JMRI, but it's MUCH easier with it.YEs, a simple toggle would do the same thing. The NCE board that costs $30 is an automatic switch.
Honestly... with the NCE system, it's not very costly to get a second PCP panel and a power supply. I do all my programming on the bench, so I have 2 sets of PCP panels with power cords... one set for my layout and one set for the bench. I use the same PowerCab and just move it from layout to bench when needed, and vice versa.
The PowerCab (handheld throttle) is the expensive part. The PCP panels and wall warts are inexpensive.
At the bench, I also interface with JMRI, which is nice, especially for programming.
I'm only a couple years into this new hobby. If I stay with it, I may end up going with the ESU Cab Control System. I've heard great things, but I'm not sure I want to spend that kind of Jack yet.
Best Customer Service anywhere!big plus is that they answer the phone!